Year in a word: X - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 马斯克

Year in a word: X

With Elon Musk at its helm, there is no telling where the revamped platform will be in a year’s time

Elon Musk announced in July that Twitter and it’s bird logo would be rebranded X

(letter, posing as noun) a frightful kind of online open-mic night, owned and dominated by Elon Musk

One of the (many) maddening things about it is that it’s not even an actual word. And yet on July 23 it was thrust upon us as one, when Elon Musk suddenly announced that the social media platform he had bought the previous year was now called X. A new black-and-white logo, designed by a fan, popped up in our bookmark bars and collective consciousness.

In 2013, the Oxford English Dictionary broke with protocol when it added “tweet” to its hallowed pages, despite that use of the word having been around for less than 10 years. Yet in the space of a decade, a neologism has become a paleologism.

Twitter as we knew it is officially dead. And with it has gone not just the familiar bird logo, but also a whole lot of Twitter vocab: the tweet has become the much more generic “post”. Gone, too, are the retweet and quote-tweet. Analysts said Musk had wiped up to $20bn off the brand’s value overnight.

The social media platform is not the first of Musk’s babies to use the letter. He has used it as a name for various business ventures — most notably X.com, an online bank he co-founded in 1999 that later merged with another company to become PayPal — as well as for his first child with former girlfriend Grimes.

We might consider a homophone of the letter an apt description of what were once the platform’s biggest advertisers: ex. Corporate giants such as Apple, Disney and IBM all deserted it after Musk endorsed an antisemitic post last month. He later apologised and said he had been misinterpreted, though he also told the exes they could “go fuck” themselves.

So the platform flails on. With Musk at its helm, there’s no telling where it will be in a year’s time. The OED should probably hold off from adding the one-letter word to its pages for now.

jemima.kelly@ft.com

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

科技巨头为什么对“通用人工智能”众说纷纭

通用人工智能被誉为硅谷下一个重大突破,但它究竟是一个科学目标,还是一个营销流行语?

洛克希德•马丁向英国推销导弹防御系统

美国防务集团希望在地缘政治紧张局势加剧以及美国投资“金穹”之际,为英国建造一个新的导弹防御系统提供帮助。

军事力量逐步就位,特朗普接近对伊朗发动打击

美国总统暗示将在数日内采取行动,美国已准备好能够打击福尔道地下核设施的部队。

普京召开的投资论坛未能吸引西方公司

俄罗斯的盟友们也只是向圣彼得堡派遣了低级别的官员和商人,但印尼总统是个例外。

微软准备退出与OpenAI的关键性谈判

ChatGPT开发商计划转型为营利性公司,促使这家软件巨头制定应对预案。

FT社评:特朗普需要慎重考虑伊朗问题上的命运抉择

美国总统可能会被拖入中东另一场寻求促成政权更迭的愚蠢行动中。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×