Canada’s political turmoil - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Canada’s political turmoil

Trump’s tariff threat has helped to precipitate a leadership crisis

After France and Germany, Canada has become the third big economy to plunge into political turmoil weeks before Donald Trump’s return as US president. Finance minister Chrystia Freeland’s stunning resignation on Monday after falling out with Justin Trudeau has prompted calls for the prime minister himself to stand down — including from within his own Liberal party. Having leadership crises in three G7 democracies just when US allies must work together to deal with a new disruptive president in the White House is unfortunate. For Canada, the timing is especially poor. The crisis was precipitated in part by Trump’s threat of 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian imports, which could severely damage its economy.

The trigger for Freeland’s departure was Trudeau’s attempt to demote her last Friday, having reportedly courted Mark Carney, former central bank governor in Canada and the UK, to replace her. The finance minister and prime minister had been at loggerheads over the government’s plan for a wide-ranging exemption to Canada’s goods and services tax and a C$250 ($175) cheque for nearly half the country’s population. Critics have decried these steps as an effort to buy votes by a government trailing badly in the polls before elections due by next October, at the cost of a soaring budget deficit.

Freeland’s scathing resignation letter referred to “costly political gimmicks”, insisting Canada must keep its “fiscal powder dry” ahead of a potential tariff war with Trump’s US. The outgoing finance minister commendably presented herself as a guardian of fiscal responsibility, though she cannot escape association with the policies that have laid the cabinet low.

The nine-year-old government has fallen far from its onetime political grace, running 20 points behind right-leaning Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre. Like centre-left parties elsewhere, Trudeau’s government has struggled to address discontent over spiralling living and housing costs, and immigration. A country that was long welcoming to newcomers began to chafe at the ambitious immigration targets on which the Liberal-led administration relied to boost sluggish growth — opening the way for the anti-elite populist Poilievre. A government once seen as embodying hopes for a renewal of liberalism in western democracies has not been helped by what many now see as Trudeau’s sanctimonious style.

Freeland’s exit, on the day another capable minister said he would stand down at the next election, suggests the prime minister has lost his government’s trust. Trudeau has said he will consider his position over the holidays. In reality, his party’s decline is highly unlikely to be reversed while he remains leader. Trudeau may believe he is best-placed to deal with Trump’s threat of tariffs on close to 80 per cent of Canada’s exports, given the relationship he built up during the president’s first term. But the returning US leader has been openly trolling him as the “governor” of the “Great State of Canada”.

Trudeau should consider whether his continued leadership is in the country’s best interests. A new leader and fresh programme might yet be able to cap the Liberals’ election losses and limit the Conservatives to a minority — forcing them to govern with partners and potentially restraining a Canadian tilt to the populist right.

The crisis in Canada highlights how Trump’s return is already upturning politics in US allies even before he is inside the White House. It demonstrates once again the need for parties of the centre-left and centre-right to find better ways to counter the rise of would-be Trumps elsewhere. For Canada’s liberal standard bearer, however, the best way to safeguard his political legacy is to hand over to someone else.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

洛克希德•马丁向英国推销导弹防御系统

美国防务集团希望在地缘政治紧张局势加剧以及美国投资“金穹”之际,为英国建造一个新的导弹防御系统提供帮助。

军事力量逐步就位,特朗普接近对伊朗发动打击

美国总统暗示将在数日内采取行动,美国已准备好能够打击福尔道地下核设施的部队。

普京召开的投资论坛未能吸引西方公司

俄罗斯的盟友们也只是向圣彼得堡派遣了低级别的官员和商人,但印尼总统是个例外。

微软准备退出与OpenAI的关键性谈判

ChatGPT开发商计划转型为营利性公司,促使这家软件巨头制定应对预案。

FT社评:特朗普需要慎重考虑伊朗问题上的命运抉择

美国总统可能会被拖入中东另一场寻求促成政权更迭的愚蠢行动中。

伊朗遇袭会引发核灾难吗?

以色列对伊朗铀浓缩设施的袭击造成了局部放射性,但污染似乎有限。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×