The markets are declaring tariff victory too soon - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
观点 美国经济

The markets are declaring tariff victory too soon

A potential supply and demand shock means the US economy may be in for years of volatility
00:00

{"text":[[{"start":null,"text":"

"}],[{"start":7.44,"text":"It is a mark of how eager investors are to put the idea of a trade war behind them that markets surged last week on the news of a tariff “deal” between the US and China."}],[{"start":22.02,"text":"Never mind that it was a 90-day pause on higher rates that is likely to bring only temporary relief. Investors bought the story that US President Donald Trump’s market friendly Treasury secretary Scott Bessent was now firmly in the driving seat, China hawk Peter Navarro had been pushed into a broom cupboard somewhere in the back of the White House and we could all go back to pre-“liberation day” bullishness."}],[{"start":49.45,"text":"I don’t buy it."}],[{"start":51.75,"text":"I think we are still in for a lot more volatility — not only in the next three months as the new normal of 10 per cent across-the-board US tariffs shakes out (and this is the best-case scenario), but over the next few years, as the long-term structural trends towards a new global economic paradigm continue."}],[{"start":74.28999999999999,"text":"Let’s start with the immediate issues. While it is too early to see inflation in the data (the producer price index, a gauge of wholesale prices, fell slightly in April), there are numerous anecdotal warning signs about tariff-related price increases on the horizon."}],[{"start":93.44,"text":"Profit margins have been squeezed and even the largest retailers seem unwilling to take a greater hit. Walmart last week announced that it was raising prices on goods like electronics and toys because of Chinese tariff rates, and warned that there would be more price rises to come."}],[{"start":113.27,"text":"“Given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced rates . . . we aren’t able to absorb all the pressure,” said Doug McMillon, the retailer’s chief executive. If Walmart feels it has to raise prices, you can bet others will, too."}],[{"start":133.57,"text":"Jay Powell, chair of the US Federal Reserve, stressed in a speech last week that “higher real rates may . . . reflect the possibility that inflation could be more volatile going forward than in the inter-crisis period of the 2010s. We may be entering a period of more frequent, and potentially more persistent, supply shocks — a difficult challenge for the economy and for central banks.”"}],[{"start":160.87,"text":"Stagflation is, of course, the big risk here. As TS Lombard managing director Steve Blitz wrote in a note last week to clients: “Even if a mild recession takes hold, a higher inflation outcome seems assured given the addition of tariffs to the trajectory of ever bigger budget deficits. Monetary policy alone cannot reverse the trend without the deficit shrinking.”"}],[{"start":188.06,"text":"Indeed. America’s poor fiscal position is the elephant in the room. Even if you assume that the US can raise between $200bn and $250bn in revenue from tariffs, that doesn’t meaningfully offset a $1.8tn deficit."}],[{"start":209.14,"text":"Add to this the new budget bill before the House of Representatives, which would add $3.3tn to the debt over 10 years, and $5.2tn if you assume that all the gimmicky expirations are extended permanently, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a non-profit. A number of hardline Republicans rejected the first draft late last week, but negotiations are ongoing, and the end result is unlikely to help the US fiscal picture."}],[{"start":246.98999999999998,"text":"America’s debt issues are structural and long-term, and they may trigger others. What happens if there’s a slowdown or a recession that causes tax receipts to decline precipitously even as interest rates remain elevated?"}],[{"start":263.72999999999996,"text":"While inflation can temporarily ease the burden of debt, it could also make doing business in the US more expensive. As Blitz notes: “One can, in fact, imagine a scenario where the Fed helps the dollar strengthen to keep in check the real interest rates needed to sustain needed inflows and all that, in turn, overwhelms the tariffs as a barrier to keep firms from sourcing foreign capital and labour.”"}],[{"start":295.35999999999996,"text":"Trump will undoubtedly try to put pressure on firms that outsource — witness his “little problem with Tim Cook” last week after Apple announced plans to source iPhones from India. But the rest of the world isn’t standing still."}],[{"start":312.39,"text":"China and many other countries have built up huge gold reserves in recent years, in expectation of decoupling and a move away from the dollar. And while gold prices fell somewhat after the market surge, I wouldn’t be surprised if there was another uptick at some point. Costco, the discount retailer, put new limits on gold bar sales last week, allowing customers to buy only one, rather than two, at a time, as it can’t keep up with demand."}],[{"start":345.71999999999997,"text":"One of the particularly tricky things about the current moment is that you can imagine both a supply and a demand shock happening at the same time. Tariffs may disrupt supply at the very time that a slowdown adversely affects demand."}],[{"start":362.40999999999997,"text":"The last time a combined supply and demand shock happened was during the first world war, according to Princeton economic historian Harold James, who gave a presentation on the topic recently at the Hoover Institution. Supply shocks tend to increase globalisation in their aftermath (which might support equity markets), while demand shocks do the opposite. When they come together, there’s no telling what can happen. Either way, James told me, such shocks “put a premium on government competence”."}],[{"start":395.64,"text":"The UK, with its “Liz Truss moment”, has already seen what can happen when that’s lacking. The US may yet too."}],[{"start":414.09,"text":""}]],"url":"https://audio.ftmailbox.cn/album/a_1747658100_6995.mp3"}

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

伊朗核问题勾起伊拉克战争阴影

美国政府正在权衡是否应该出兵伊朗,这不禁令人回想起20年前的伊拉克战争阴影。

以色列冲突升级之际,海湾君主国拉近与宿敌伊朗的关系

沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋及其他地区国家担心,一旦美国对伊朗发动打击,它们将成为报复目标。

科技巨头为什么对“通用人工智能”众说纷纭

通用人工智能被誉为硅谷下一个重大突破,但它究竟是一个科学目标,还是一个营销流行语?

洛克希德•马丁向英国推销导弹防御系统

美国防务集团希望在地缘政治紧张局势加剧以及美国投资“金穹”之际,为英国建造一个新的导弹防御系统提供帮助。

军事力量逐步就位,特朗普接近对伊朗发动打击

美国总统暗示将在数日内采取行动,美国已准备好能够打击福尔道地下核设施的部队。

普京召开的投资论坛未能吸引西方公司

俄罗斯的盟友们也只是向圣彼得堡派遣了低级别的官员和商人,但印尼总统是个例外。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×