Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

“喂大猩猩”:美国企业界如何应对特朗普的关税威胁

破坏性贸易战的威胁引发了全球最有权势的商界领袖发起的游说行动。

有人能复制沃伦•巴菲特的投资业绩吗?

自1965年以来,“奥马哈的圣人”一直是伯克希尔•哈撒韦背后的核心动力。他的继任者将面临巨大的挑战。

阿贝尔从巴菲特手中接过伯克希尔•哈撒韦,面临艰巨挑战

钦点的接班人继承了创纪录的现金储备,但将比“奥马哈先知”受到更多审视。

中国出口商在第三国“洗白”产品以规避特朗普关税

亚洲邻国担心成为实际上运往美国的贸易中转站。

特朗普表示,他不知道自己是否需要遵守美国宪法

总统拒绝支持正当程序,因为他驱逐无证移民的努力受到法官的阻挠。

秘鲁一座金矿13名被绑架工人的遗体被发现

警卫遇害凸显了安第斯国家非法采矿和犯罪暴力日益严重的问题。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×